Feb. 14-15: Online Days
Feb. 18-22: On-site Days in Washington DC

Review Criteria

CIES relies on a team of volunteer reviewers from across the Society to evaluate paper, panel, roundtable and poster session proposals. Proposals submitted to specific SIGs are reviewed by volunteers appointed by that SIG; all other proposals are reviewed by volunteers assigned to the General Pool. The following five criteria and 4-point rating scale will be used for CIES 2023:

REVIEW CRITERIA

RELEVANCE

Relevance of topic as related to comparative and international education, meeting theme and/or SIG/Committee

THEORY/CONTEXT

Strength of theoretical framework or contextualization 

INQUIRY

Strength of critical analysis or research methods (including design, data collection, analysis, etc.)

FINDINGS

Clarity and coherence in the presentation of findings or argument

CONTRIBUTION

Scholarly originality or contribution to existing knowledge

        or

If this submission is a project report or a practice-oriented presentation, please evaluate its application of existing scholarly knowledge

 

REVIEW RATING SCALE

Proposals are evaluated on a four-point scale according to five criteria. Reviewers will assign scores based on how adequately the proposals address each criteria:

1) Poor
2) Acceptable
3) Good
4) Excellent